(English below)<\/em><\/p>\n Ste pri novem valu medijskega poro\u010danja o migracijah na poljsko-beloruski meji prepoznali kak\u0161en ponavljajo\u010d se vzorec? Mar ni vsakih nekaj let v medijih podobna \u201cbegunska kriza\u201d, ki se seli iz enega konca Evrope na drugega in za nekaj tednov okupira domi\u0161ljijo me\u0161\u010danske javnosti? Pred desetletjem smo imeli Ceuto in Melillo, nato Lampeduso, leta 2015 je pri\u0161la balkanska pot, zdaj je na vrsti Poljska. Vsaki\u010d imamo opravka z isto spektakularizacijo trplenja – prikazen biblijskih mno\u017eic, ki so hkrati napadalci in \u017ertve. Vsaki\u010d nastopi ista moralna panika o uni\u010denju Evrope, vsaki\u010d se najde v zgodbi kak\u0161en hudoben lokalni samodr\u017eec, vsaki\u010d se me\u0161ajo isti nasprotujo\u010di si izrazi: begunski val, kriza, pritisk na meje, \u010dlovekove pravice, vojska, humanost\u2026 In med vsakim takim spektaklom v poro\u010danju skrivnostno manjka kakr\u0161na koli omemba glavnega akterja dogajanja: imperialnih sil. Namesto, da bi v humanitarni krizi videli uveljavljanje evropskih interesov na njeni periferiji, je kriza na\u010drtno depolitizirana \u2013 seveda, da gledalec v spektaklu trplenja ne more prepoznati pravega krivca.<\/p>\n Toda t.i. \u201cmigracijske krize\u201d se ne zgodijo v politi\u010dnem vakumu. Spektakel trpljenja, ki se seli iz ene periferne dr\u017eave v drugo, je posledica specifi\u010dnih politi\u010dnih odlo\u010ditev zahodnih velesil pri nadzorovanju globalnih resursov. Zagotovo ne moremo spregledati, da so \u017ertve\/napadalci na evropskih mejah vedno in povsod prebivalci nekdanjih evropskih kolonij. Nekateri so iz dr\u017eav, ki so ostale ekonomsko podvr\u017eene in zadol\u017eene nekdanjim gospodarjem (Al\u017eirija, Maroko, Tunizija, Nigerija, Kongo\u2026), drugi pa iz dr\u017eav, ki so se posku\u0161ale tudi ekonomsko osamosvojiti od imperialnih sil in so bile za to brutalno kaznovane z voja\u0161kimi invazijami (Libija, Irak, Sirija, Afganistan, Palestina\u2026). Kak\u0161no povezavo imajo vsi ti ljudje z Evropo danes? Dejanko bi lahko bili dr\u017eavljani EU in ZDA, saj le-te obvladujejo ve\u010dino njihovih resursov, jim dolo\u010dajo voditelje in se poganjajo z njihovo delovno silo.<\/p>\n Vpra\u0161anje dela je klju\u010dno – prebivalci biv\u0161ih kolonij so neko\u010d lahko potovali na delo v Zahodno Evropo, kjer so poganjali \u010dude\u017eno povojno gospodarsko rast, v 90ih pa so evropske gospodarske sile na\u0161le nov bazen poceni delavcev v biv\u0161ih socialisti\u010dnih republikah, ki so jih preko \u0161engenskega sporazuma strate\u0161ko integrirale v imeprialni red. To je pomenilo, da je milijone delavcev in beguncev zunaj \u0161engenskih meja ostalo odrezanih od virov pre\u017eivetja, edini na\u010din vstopa v EU pa je postal azil. Tako smo v 90ih dobili prve \u201cbegunske krize\u201d, prve spektakle trplenja, prve begunske ladje in mrtve v Mediteranu. Z uni\u010denjem legalnih poti in mejne preto\u010dnosti, je nastala \u201cpodzemna \u017eeleznica\u201d za skrito prehajanje meja. Ob tihotapski industriji je zrastlo tudi samoniklo migrantsko gibanje, mno\u017ei\u010dna mobilizacija ljudi za dostop do bogatih dr\u017eav, ki so bogatele na njihov ra\u010dun. In na drugi strani je zrastel militarizirani mejni re\u017eim z ne\u0161tetimi podizvajalci: t.i. Trdnjava Evropa.<\/p>\n Imperialne sile so na iregularne migracije reagirale z eksternalizacijo meja \u2013 oboro\u017eile in financirale so kolaborantske vlade na periferiji EU, da pri njih zadr\u017eujejo migrante. Te so vzele evropski denar in oro\u017eje, ter zgradile nehumana tabori\u0161\u010da za zadr\u017eevanje obubo\u017eanih mno\u017eic. Toda ta strategija EU v vojni proti migracijam je imela eno veliko pomanjklivost: ustvarila je velike koncentracije ljudi, ki na periferiji EU \u017eivijo v skrajno te\u017ekih razmerah, ti pa lahko postanejo pogajalsko orodje dr\u017eav z imperialnim sredi\u0161\u010dem. Ko se je Gaddafi zna\u0161el pod napadom koalicije ZDA\/VB, se je zatekel h gro\u017enjam o mno\u017ei\u010dnih migracijah Afri\u010danov v Evropo. Erdogan je v sporazumih z EU izsilil milijarde evrov izpla\u010dil, da zadr\u017euje migrante na tur\u0161kih tleh. Leta 2015 je na vrhuncu evropske dol\u017eni\u0161ke krize vlada gr\u0161ke Syrize imela bolj malo razlogov, da bi za Nem\u010dijo \u0161e naprej izvajala mejno represijo. Gr\u010diji je sledil tudi Orban, ki je postavil Angelo Merkel pred hudo preizku\u0161njo in jo prisilil, da odpre meje za begunce. Tej pogajalski strategiji se re\u010de \u201cweapons of mass migration\u201d in je bila zgodovinsko ve\u010dkrat koristna za polperiferne dr\u017eave v podrejenih polo\u017eajih. Nenazadnje je tudi Slovenija ena izmed dr\u017eav, ki strate\u0161ko uporablja svoj polo\u017eaj \u0161engenske dr\u017eave v pogajanjih z Brusljem (in se tudi kr\u010devito bori, da ji tega lukrativnega polo\u017eaja z vstopom v \u0160engen ne bi odnesla Hrva\u0161ka). EU pa nasprotno grozi dr\u017eavam, ki no\u010dejo sprejemati deportirancev, z gospodarskimi in vizumskimi sankcijami.<\/p>\n Tako imamo tri akterje: imperialno sredi\u0161\u010de, ki \u017eeli obvladovati resurse in pretok delovne sile, polperiferne dr\u017eave, ki so vpete v vzdr\u017eevanje imperija, ter migrante z globalne periferije, ki so odrezani od sredstev za pre\u017eivetje in lahko pre\u017eivijo le s fizi\u010dno selitvijo v imperialni center. Spor med prvima dvema tako odpre vrata prilo\u017enosti migrantskemu gibanju. To se je zgodilo leta 2015, ko se je na Balkanu zakuhal \u201cpopoln vihar\u201d mno\u017ei\u010dne koncentracije beguncev iz Sirije in sporov bogatih evropskih dr\u017eav z evropsko periferijo. Begunci so izkoristili prilo\u017enost in z velikimi \u017ertvami uspeli izsiliti zgodovinski humanitarni koridor. Takrat vlogo imperialnih varuhov meja namesto Gr\u010dije in Tur\u010dije prevzela tudi kolaboranstka vlada Slovenije, ki je igrala klju\u010dno vlogo pri zaprtju humanitarnega koridorja – Cerar je bil celo prvi predlagatelj strategije zapiranja, ki sta se ji potem pridru\u017eila Makedonija in kasneje Hrva\u0161ka (ne pozabimo, da je bila Hrva\u0161ka v slovenskih medijih najprej hudobna dr\u017eava, ki je \u201cpotiskala migrante \u010dez slovensko mejo\u201d, na kar je Cerar \u201cmoral odgovoriti\u201d z rezilno \u017eico na meji – zdaj, ko Hrva\u0161ka z brutalnim nasiljem potiska migrante nazaj v BiH pa ni ve\u010d tako hudobna).<\/p>\n Kaj se torej danes dogaja na poljsko-beloruski meji? Kontekst je ve\u010d kot jasen: imperialna koalicija ZDA in EU \u017ee desetletja izvajata ekonomsko in voja\u0161ko ekspanzijo v vzhodno evropske dr\u017eave, ki spadajo pod vplivno obmo\u010dje Rusije. Belorusija, ki jo pretresa notranja politi\u010dna kriza, se je izkazala za \u0161ibek \u010dlen in je zato pristala v sredi\u0161\u010du evropskih pritiskov. Luka\u0161enko je v boju proti evropskim sankcijam morda res uporabil tudi strategijo \u201cweapons of mass migration\u201d, toda Belorusija nima velike koncentracije beguncev in ne le\u017ei na prehodnem obmo\u010dju. Temu primerno majhna je tudi sama mobilizacija beguncev v gibanju. \u0160tevilo tistih, ki so se odlo\u010dili za let ali kopensko pot v oddaljeno Belorusijo je zgolj nekaj tiso\u010d \u2013 manj, kot se jih \u017ee nekaj let nahaja v enako grozljivih razmerah v BiH. Retorika o zlobnemu diktatorju, ki \u201csili begunce \u010dez mejo\u201d je povsem zavr\u017ena. Luka\u0161enku lahko o\u010ditamo marsikaj, a na udaru se je zna\u0161el prav zato, ker ne igra vloge poslu\u0161nega podizvajalca evropskega mejnega re\u017eima. Begunci so se za tvegano pot skozi Belorusijo odlo\u010dili sami \u2013 vedo, da se razpoka te vrste v Trdnjavi Evrope pojavi le na vsakih nekaj let in jo je potrebno izkoristiti. In ne pozabimo, kdo je preusmeril migrantsko pot iz Balkana v oddaljeno Belorusijo: to sta slovenska in hrva\u0161ka policija, ki sta zaprla ju\u017eno pot s sistemati\u010dnimi nasilnimi pushbacki in mu\u010denjem migrantov.<\/p>\n Za humanitarno krizo in smrti v Belorusiji je torej potrebno pogledati na evropsko stran meje. Poljska policija je namre\u010d tista, ki brutalizirata begunce, kot bi dobesedno posnemala taktike, ki so jih nedavno razvili na\u0161i policisti na Balkanu. In humanitarna kriza na meji se je zgodila zato, ker to zahteva EU, ta zahteva pa ustreza notranje-politi\u010dnim interesom konzervativne Poljske vlade. Ta bi lahko preprosto rekla, da bo pustila prosilcem za azil prestopiti dr\u017eavo in uveljavljati svojo pravico v ciljni dr\u017eavi Nem\u010diji. Toda poljska vlada prav tako v tem trenutku potrebuje svoj spektakel, da preusmeri pozornost doma\u010dih volilcev od lastnih \u0161kandalov in se pozicionira kot braniteljica naroda.<\/p>\n Velika ironija spopadov na meji je v tem, da Poljska ne brani meje zase, saj si niti en begunec ne \u017eeli ostati tam \u2013 brani jo za svoje domnevne \u201csovra\u017enice\u201d, bogate “vladavine prava” na zahodu EU. Odtod tudi zmedeno poro\u010danje evropskega medijskega establi\u0161menta, ki ne ve, kako naj obravnava nepriljubljeno poljsko vlado: na eni strani jo obravnava kot \u017ertev \u201cLuka\u0161enkovega napada\u201d in predstavlja migrante kot gverilsko vojsko, na drugi strani pa pretaka krokodilje solze nad ubogimi migranti, obto\u017euje Poljsko kr\u0161itev \u010dlovekovih pravic in jo kara, ker no\u010de sprejeti na svoje meje evropske mejne policije Frontex \u2013 ki je, mimogrede, bistveno bolj koruptivna in nasilna kr\u0161iteljica \u010dlovekovih pravic, kot je poljska policija!<\/p>\n Vso to spektakularizacijo in medijske spine moramo najostreje zavrniti. Begunci niso nemo\u010dne \u017ertve diktatorskega lutkarja, ampak se aktivno borijo za svojo svobodo in pravico do bolj\u0161ega \u017eivljenja. Bogate dr\u017eave EU niso braniteljice njihovih \u010dlovekovih pravic, ampak so okupatorke in izkori\u0161\u010devalke njihovih de\u017eel, ki jim zdaj s pomo\u010djo skrajno desne poljske vlade z najbolj odurnimi metodami prepre\u010dujejo dostop do azila. In kar je klju\u010dno: \u0161tevilni ljudje na Poljskem in \u0161irom Evrope vidijo onkraj teh geopoliti\u010dnih igric in se povezujejo v solidarnosti do migrantskega gibanja \u2013 izvajajo proteste in prihajajo pomagati na teren. Pridru\u017eujemo se jim v brezpogojni solidarnosti z migranti, zahtevi po koncu pushbackov, koncu eksternalizacije mejnega re\u017eima, koncu voja\u0161kih avantur NATA in ekonomskemu podjarmljanju tujih dr\u017eav. Tako na Poljskem kot v Sloveniji si ne \u017eelimo biti podizvajalci imperialnih politik! Naj bo trenutna vojna na poljski meji udarec Trdnjavi Evrope, ne pa spodbuda za njeno krepitev.<\/p>\n Kdor pa je tiho o imperializmu, naj mol\u010di tudi o humanitarni krizi na meji!<\/p>\n ….<\/p>\n Begunce na poti lahko direktno podprete tudi z donacijami – obrnite se na stran “Support refugees in Poland, Belarus and Lithuania”<\/a> English:<\/strong><\/p>\n Did you recognize any familiar themes with the new wave of media reports about migrations on the Polish-Belarusian border? Isn\u2019t there another new \u201crefugee crisis\u201d in the media every few years, which moves from one end of Europe to the other, and for a few weeks occupies the imagination of the bourgeois public? A decade ago we had Ceuta and Melilla, then Lampedusa, in 2015 there was the Balkan route, and now it is Poland\u2019s turn. Every time we have the same spectacle of suffering – the display of the biblical hordes, which are simultaneously aggressors and victims. Every time we have the same moral panic about the destruction of Europe, in every story appears some evil local autocrat, and every time the same contradictory terms appear: wave of refugees, crisis, pressure on the border, human rights, the military, humanity\u2026 And between every reported spectacle, there is a concealed omission of any mention of the main cause of these events: imperialist force. Instead of seeing, in the humanitarian crisis, the realization of European interests on its periphery, the crisis is deliberately depoliticized – of course, so that the viewer of the spectacle of suffering can\u2019t recognize who is actually responsible.<\/p>\n Likewise, these \u201cmigrant crises\u201d don\u2019t happen in a political vacuum. The spectacle of suffering, which moves from one peripheral country to another, is a direct consequence of specific political decisions made by Western superpowers for the sake of securing global resources. We certainly cannot overlook that the \u2018victim\/aggressors\u2019 on the European borders are everywhere, and in every case, residents of former European colonies. Some are from countries which remained defacto economic dependencies to their former occupiers (Algeria, Morocco, Tunisia, Nigeria, Congo, etc.), while others are from countries which attempted to liberate themselves economically from imperialist forces, and were for this reason victims of military retribution and invasion (Libya, Iraq, Syria, Afghanistan, Palestine, etc.) What connection do these people have to Europe today? Frankly, they could be citizens of the EU and the United States, given that these control the majority of their nation\u2019s resources, dictate their political leadership, and profit from their workforce.<\/p>\n The question of work is crucial – the residents of former colonies were once able to travel to work in Western Europe, where they contributed to an incredible post-war economic expansion, before these European economic forces found a new reservoir of cheap labour in the former socialist republics, which they integrated into the imperialist order through Schengen agreement. This meant that millions of workers and refugees outside of the Schengen border were cut off from means of survival, and the only means of entry into the EU became doing so through asylum. This is how, in the 90s, we got our first \u2018refugee crises\u2019, the first spectacles of suffering, the first refugee boats and accompanying deaths in the Mediterranean. Through the destruction of the legal means for crossing the border, an \u2018underground railroad\u2019 for the covert crossing of borders came into existence. Along with the smuggling industry grew spontaneous migratory movement, a vast mobilization of people for entry into the wealthy countries which enriched themselves at their expense. On the other side, there grew an entire border regime with countless collaborators: ie. Fortress Europe.<\/p>\n The imperialist forces reacted to the extraordinary migrations through an externalization of borders – they armed and financed collaborationist regimes on the periphery of Europe, so that they would halt migrant movement. These regimes took European money and weapons, and built inhuman camps for the detaining of the impoverished multitudes. This EU strategy in their war against migration had a significant flaw: it created large concentrations of people who live on the periphery of Europe in extremely difficult conditions, whose situation becomes a negotiating tool for countries against the imperialist core. When Gaddafi found himself under attack by the USA\/GB coalition, he resorted to threats about mass migrations of Africans into Europe. Erdogan, in his agreements with the EU, extorted millions of euros in exchange for detaining migrants in Turkish territory. In the year 2015, at the height of the European debt crisis, the Greek Syriza government had little reason that it would, for Germany\u2019s sake, continue to enforce repression of migration at the border. Orban followed Greece, when he forced Angela Merkel\u2019s hand to open the borders for refugees. The name for this negotiating strategy is \u201cweapons of mass migration,\u201d and it has historically proved effective for semi-peripheral countries in tough circumstances. Slovenia also belongs among the countries which strategically uses its position as a Schengen state in negotiations with Brussels (leading to bitter conflicts with Croatia to keep the latter from usurping this lucrative position through entering into Schengen.) EU, on the other hand, threatens countries which refuse to accept deportations with economic sanctions and sanctions against mobility.<\/p>\n So we have three forces: the imperialist core which seeks to dominate resources and the movement of labor forces, the semi-peripheral countries which are committed to the maintenance of empire, and finally the migrants and global periphery, who are cut off from any means of survival, and who can survive only through physical relocation into the imperial centers. The conflict between the first two groups creates the possibility for migrant movements. This happened in 2015, when there developed a \u2018perfect storm\u2019 of massive concentrations of refugees from Syria, and simultaneous conflicts between the wealthy European nations and the European periphery. Refugees took advantage of the opportunity, and with great casualties managed to create a historical humanitarian corridor. At that time, the role of imperialist border watchdog, along with Greece and Turkey, was taken up by the collaborationist government of Slovenia, which played a key role in the closing of this humanitarian corridor – Cerar was even among the first to recommend the closure, before being joined by Macedonia and, later, Croatia (let\u2019s not forget, that Croatia was first portrayed as a villain in the Slovenian media for its role in \u201cforcing migrants through the Slovenian border\u201d, to which Cerar \u201chad to respond\u201d with barbed wire fences along the border – now, that Croatia, with equally brutal force, pushes migrants back into Bosnia and Herzegovina, it is seen in a more positive light.)<\/p>\n So what exactly is happening today on the Polish-Belarusian border? The context is much clearer: the imperialist coalition of the USA and EU has for decades enacted an economic and military expansion into Eastern European countries, which otherwise fall under the influence of Russian foreign policy. Belarus, which is experiencing an internal political crisis, was perceived as a weak link, and for this reason came into the crosshairs of European pressure. Lukashenko may well have used the strategy of \u201cweapons of mass migration\u201d in the conflict against European sanctions, but Belarus has a negligible concentration of refugees, and does not occupy a significant geographic position for migration. The mobilization of refugee movement is, in itself, also lacking. The number of those who attempted flights or land routes to distant Belarus is only in the few thousands – fewer than have been taking equally dangerous routes to Bosnia and Herzegovina for years. The rhetoric of the evil dictator who is \u201cforcing refugees over the border\u201d is completely dishonest. Criticisms can be levelled at Lukashenko, but the current demonization is a direct consequence of his not playing the role of puppet for the primary European regime. The refugees decided to attempt the risky path through Belarus themselves – knowing that these kinds of cracks in Fortress Europe appear only once every few years, and have to be taken advantage of. And lets not forget who redirected the path of refugees from the Balkans to distant Belarus: Slovenian and Croatian policies which closed the Southern route through systematic violent repression and torture of migrants.<\/p>\n For the humanitarian crisis and deaths in Belarus, therefore, it is important to look on the European side of the border. The Polish policy is the one which brutalizes refugees, as though it were directly imitating the recent tactics of our officers in the Balkans. The humanitarian crisis on the border happened because this was what EU policy sought, and this coincided with the internal-political interests of the conservative Polish government. This government could honestly say it will let asylum seekers pass through the country and try to exercise their rights in their final destination of Germany. But the Polish government, at this moment, needs its own spectacle, to redirect the attention of domestic voters from the recent scandals, and to present themselves as the defenders of the country.<\/p>\n A significant irony of the conflict over borders is that Poland isn\u2019t defending the border for its own sake, since no refugees have any intention of staying there – it is defending it on behalf of its past \u2018enemies\u2019, the \u2018wealthy ruling powers\u2019 in Western Europe. As a direct consequence we get the confused reporting of the European media establishment, which doesn\u2019t know how to present the maligned Polish government: on the one hand, they are presented as the victim of \u201cLukeshensko\u2019s assault\u201d and the migrants are presented as a defacto guerilla force, and on the other hand with crocodile tears for the poor migrants, criticizing the Polish violation of human rights and their refusal to accept the European border police Frontex on its own borders – which, for the record, is an even more corrupt and aggressive violator of human rights than the Polish police force!<\/p>\n This entire spectacle-ization and media spin has to be rejected outright. Refugees aren\u2019t weak victims of dictator puppet masters, but are actively struggling for their freedom and right to a better life. The wealthy EU countries aren’t defenders of refugees\u2019 human rights, but are occupiers and exploiters of their countries, and which with the assistance of the right wing Polish government are stopping refugees with the most repulsive methods at their disposal. And what is key: many people in Poland, and in Europe generally, see through these geopolitical games and are connecting in solidarity with the migrant movements – carrying out protests and offering help on the ground. We join them in unconditional solidarity with migrants, in demanding an end to repression, an end to the externalizing of border regimes, an end to the military overtures of NATO in the economic destruction of foreign countries. In Poland and in Slovenia, we refuse to be collaborators to imperialist politics! Let the imminent conflict on the Polish border be a strike against Fortress Europe, and not an excuse for its reinforcement.<\/p>\n Whoever is silent about imperialism, should also remain silent about the humanitarian crisis on the border!<\/p>\n …<\/p>\n For direct support of refugees please look to “Support refugees in Poland, Belarus and Lithuania”<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" KDO STOJI ZA “MIGRACIJSKIMI KRIZAMI”? EVROPSKI IMPERIALIZEM! (English below) Ste pri novem valu medijskega poro\u010danja o migracijah na poljsko-beloruski meji prepoznali kak\u0161en ponavljajo\u010d se vzorec? […]<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>","protected":false},"author":7,"featured_media":980,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[4],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-981","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-delovna-skupina-za-azil"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ambasada-rog.demo.wasd.si\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/981","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ambasada-rog.demo.wasd.si\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ambasada-rog.demo.wasd.si\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ambasada-rog.demo.wasd.si\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/7"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ambasada-rog.demo.wasd.si\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=981"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/ambasada-rog.demo.wasd.si\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/981\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ambasada-rog.demo.wasd.si\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/980"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ambasada-rog.demo.wasd.si\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=981"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ambasada-rog.demo.wasd.si\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=981"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ambasada-rog.demo.wasd.si\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=981"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
\n……………………………..<\/p>\nWho is behind the \u201cmigrant crisis?\u201d<\/h2>\n
European Imperialism!<\/h1>\n